Guest Editorial:Progress
in the Prevention and Management of Malignant Melanoma
Douglas Reintgen, MD, Program Leader, Cutaneous Oncology
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute Associate Professor
of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
The incidence of malignant
melanoma is increasing at a faster rate than that of any other cancer in the United
States (Fig 1). It is estimated that for people born in the year 2000, one in
75 people will be diagnosed with the disease sometime during his or her lifetime.
The number of people diagnosed with melanoma rose by approximately 4% per year
from 1973 to 1992. The American Cancer Society estimates that 34,100 people will
be diagnosed with melanoma in the United States in 1995, an approximate rate of
one case every 15 minutes! This "undeclared epidemic" of melanoma is
believed to be the consequence of the attitudes of the 1960s and 1970s, when people
began to spend more time in the sun and wear less clothing. In addition, the thinning
of the ozone layer, with the concomitant increase in ultraviolet radiation exposure
to the skin, is also implicated. Despite increasing worldwide attention to melanoma
as a result of campaigns for prevention and early detection of melanoma, the incidence
in all parts of the world continues to increase.
Fig 1. - The epidemic of melanoma will continue into the next decade. This
graph depicts the projected rate of malignant melanoma incidence for people
born in these years. By the year 2000, an estimated 1 in 75 people will be diagnosed
with malignant melanoma.
Melanoma, the deadliest
of skin cancers, is now deadlier, especially in men over 50 years of age. The
rate of deaths as a result of melanoma rose by 34% to nearly 2.2 per 100,000
people in 1992, compared with a rate of 1.6 per 100,000 in 1973 (Fig 2). Twice
as many men die of melanoma as women. According to the Centers for Disease Control,
a 48% increase in the rate of men who died of melanoma from 1973 to 1992 accounted
for the largest increase among all cancers in men. In 1995, the number of melanoma
deaths for both sexes in the United States is expected to reach 7200.
Fig 2. - The rise in the incidence of melanoma represents the fastest increase
in the diagnosis of any cancer. More people die of melanoma today than at any
time in the past.
Cutaneous melanoma is not
a subtle disease. Fig 3 illustrates a typical lesion that is hallmarked by the
mnemonic "ABCD" for early diagnosis: asymmetry in its overall
pattern, an irregular border, a variegated color pattern, and
a diameter greater than 6 mm. An excisional biopsy of this lesion should
be performed, and if a melanoma is diagnosed, the area should be widely excised.
The diagnostic biopsy or appropriate referral should be obvious procedures for
the primary care providers who are performing most of the physical examinations
in the United States. Despite a relatively obvious diagnosis, however, melanoma
incidence continues to increase and the death rate continues to climb. Until
translational research can bring more benefits of basic science investigations
to the bedside, advances in controlling the disease will depend on prevention,
early detection, more accurate staging, and better adjuvant therapies.
Fig 3. - Shown in this chest lesion of a 40-year-old man are the important
characteristics for the diagnosis of melanoma, which include an asymmetric lesion,
border irregularity, color variation, and a diameter greater than 6 mm (original
magnification ยด 10).
This issue of Cancer
Control explores the evolving care of the melanoma patient. Howard Koh,
MD, MPH, and Alan C. Geller, RN, MPH, of the Boston University School of Medicine,
have led the national effort with education and early detection programs. Since
its beginning eight years ago, the American Academy of Dermatology under Dr.
Koh's leadership has sponsored a demonstration project for the early detection
of skin cancers and melanoma. Enrollment has expanded each year, which attests
to the demand for the service. The project is staffed by dermatologists who
screen individuals for melanomas at a "teachable" moment, at which
time educational materials are offered for prevention and skin self-examination.
A large percentage of melanomas diagnosed in the screen are "thin"
and curable, thereby providing indirect evidence of efficacy. Yet, less than
1% of the population is served by this national program. To realize decreases
in the incidence and mortality rates for melanoma, primary care providers need
to be aware of the need for a complete skin examination and the differential
diagnosis of pigmented lesions, and they should be motivated to include a skin
examination as part of a routine physical examination. Health care professionals
who are responsible for conducting the majority of the physical examinations
in the United States - primary care providers, physician assistants, and nurse
practitioners - need to be more involved in the early diagnosis of the disease.
This is the only viable strategy from a public health viewpoint that will lead
to a decreased incidence of malignant melanoma.
Yan-An Su, MD, PhD, and
Jeffrey M. Trent, PhD, of the National Center for the Human Genome Project have
been involved for several years in an investigation of a tumor suppressor gene
for melanoma on chromosome 6. They review their work on the genetics of melanoma
and the new data on the p16 gene. Approximately 8% to 12% of melanomas occur
within family groups; an individual with one relative who is affected with the
disease has a relative risk of 2.3 for developing melanoma compared with that
of the general population. Excitement was generated in the fall of 1994 with
the announcement of the isolation of the p16 gene, a tumor suppressor gene mapped
to chromosome 9p21.[1] The p16 protein binds to cyclin-dependent kinase and
inhibits the ability of this enzyme to bind with cyclin D, thus blocking the
passage of the cell through the cell cycle. Deletions or mutations of the p16
gene cause abnormal cell cycling and growth. Six different mutated genes have
been found in 13 of 18 melanoma kindreds, with the mutation segregating with
the melanoma development.[2] However, 31% of those with the mutation have not
yet developed melanoma. Since the mutation is thought to have 80% penetrance,
these individuals may be placed in intensive screening programs with suitable
education for prevention (eg, hats, sunscreens) and skin self-examination.
Isaiah Fidler, DVM, PhD,
from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center discusses the mechanisms of melanoma metastases
and his work on metastases to the central nervous system. He has demonstrated
that the outcome of metastases involves the interaction of the metastatic cell
with the host organ environment, with the discovery of these mechanisms leading
to better methods of therapeutic interventions.
Investigators at our institution
have been developing new assays for occult metastases for melanoma. These use
molecular biology techniques to analyze for gene products of the tyrosinase
gene. All cells of the body have the tyrosinase gene, but only cells that are
actively producing pigment will express the mRNA for the gene. It is hypothesized
that the presence of mRNA in a lymph node preparation, the peripheral blood,
or a bone marrow specimen suggests that metastatic melanoma cells are present
in that immune compartment. Combined with the new technologies of lymphatic
mapping and selective lymphadenectomy for the primary surgical treatment of
melanoma, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for "submicroscopic"
metastases has the potential to provide staging information that can be orders
of magnitude greater in sensitivity than routine histologic examination of the
nodal basins.
Hilliard F. Seigler, MD,
and associates from Duke University Medical Center have been investigating a
gene therapy approach for treating stage IV melanoma. In this protocol, metastatic
tumors are harvested, the gene for interferon gamma is inserted, and the irradiated
but metabolically active tumor cells are returned to the patient. Timothy L.
Darrow, PhD, Zeinab Abdel-Wahab, PhD, and Dr. Seigler discuss the various approaches
to gene therapy and their phase I human trial.
Christopher A. Puleo, PA-C,
of Moffitt Cancer Center and Marianne Luh of Venus Medical, Inc., discuss the
management of extremity lymphedema. Lymphedema occurs in up to 40% of the lymph
node dissections for malignant melanoma and causes the most morbidity for the
patient after primary therapy. Nodal staging with sentinel node biopsy has the
potential to limit this morbidity only to patients with solid evidence of metastases
in the node drainage basin (those with positive sentinel nodes), but the problem
remains in those patients requiring a complete node dissection. Lymphedema can
cause time away from work and significant disability. A home care program consisting
of massage, exercise, and sequential lymphatic compression pumps is outlined
to minimize lost time and inconvenience for the patient.
The "Cancer Economics"
section reviews Moffitt Cancer Center's first attempt at cost:outcome measurements
for melanoma care. Such analyses are becoming increasingly important in this
era of health care reform and cost cutting. The reform rhetoric underemphasizes
the question of who supports the research and education missions of the academic
medical centers. The example given illustrates that a modest initial investment
in new technology research can save millions of dollars in future health care
costs. All groups - insurance companies, the government, community hospitals,
and academic medical centers - must share in this added cost for medical research.
Claudia Berman, MD, has
led the effort for the expanded role of nuclear medicine in melanoma care. Lymphoscintigraphy
in the melanoma patient has helped surgeons plan the operative approaches to
ensure that all basins and nodes at risk for metastases are removed at the initial
treatment. This application has created a new field for radioactive colloid
scans and allows nuclear medicine physicians to expand their practices.
Adjuvant interferon is
believed to benefit only 10% to 15% of the treated population. Certainly, this
is neither the final result that investigators are hoping to achieve nor the
only population that investigators are hoping to help. Research groups are actively
involved in vaccine trials for treating patients with metastatic disease. Craig
L. Slingluff, Jr, MD, of the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center describes
his initial work with the development of a peptide vaccine. It has been found
that an immune response can be generated against peptides on the melanoma cell
surface. If this immune response can be augmented, it may be possible to vaccinate
patients against disease or treat patients with active disease with a mass-
produced quantities of peptide. This approach has obvious advantages over the
process of taking the patient's tumor and developing a vaccine, which would
be applicable to only approximately 5% of the population.
This is an exciting time
to be involved in the investigation and care of patients with melanoma. The
progress that has taken place in the last five years holds tremendous promise
for the future.
References
1. Kamb A, Shattuck-Eidens
D, Eeles R, et al. Analysis of the p16 gene (CDKN2) as a candidate for the chromosome
9p melanoma susceptibility locus. Nat Genet. 1994;8:23-26.
2. Hussussian CJ, Struewing
JP, Goldstein AM, et al. Germline p16 mutations in familial melanoma. Nat Genet.
1994;8:15-21.