Andrew Del Gaizo, MD, MBA
Andrew Del Gaizo, MD, MBA
Specialty: Radiology
Program: Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology
Language(s): English
-
Publications
- Chaudhry H, Del Gaizo AJ, Frigini LA, Goldberg-Stein S, Long SD, Metwalli ZA, Morgan JA, Nguyen XV, Parker MS, Abujudeh H. Forty-One Million RADPEER Reviews Later: What We Have Learned and Are Still Learning. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jun.17(6):779-785. Pubmedid: 31991118.
- Del Gaizo AJ, Itri JN, Pendergrast TE, Tappouni R. Diagnostic Error Categorization at Abdominal Imaging Peer Learning Conference. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2020 Feb.48(6):535-542. Pubmedid: 30244814.
- McAdams CR, Del Gaizo AJ. The utility of scrotal ultrasonography in the emergent setting: beyond epididymitis versus torsion. Emerg Radiol. 2018 Aug.25(4):341-348. Pubmedid: 29679169.
- Del Gaizo AJ, Lall C, Allen BC, Leyendecker JR. From esophagus to rectum: a comprehensive review of alimentary tract perforations at computed tomography. Abdom Imaging. 2014 Aug.39(4):802-823. Pubmedid: 24584681.
- Allen BC, Tirman P, Jennings Clingan M, Manny J, Del Gaizo AJ, Leyendecker JR. Characterizing solid renal neoplasms with MRI in adults. Abdom Imaging. 2014 Apr.39(2):358-387. Pubmedid: 24446014.
- Del Gaizo AJ, Fletcher JG, Yu L, Paden RG, Spencer GC, Leng S, Silva AM, Fidler JL, Silva AC, Hara AK. Reducing radiation dose in CT enterography. Radiographics. 2013 Jul.33(4):1109-1124. Pubmedid: 23842974.
- Del Gaizo A, Silva AC, Lam-Himlin DM, Allen BC, Leyendecker J, Kawashima A. Magnetic resonance imaging of solid urethral and peri-urethral lesions. Insights Imaging. 2013 Aug.4(4):461-469. Pubmedid: 23686749. Pmcid: PMC3731464.
- Del Gaizo A, Banerjee S, Terk M. Adult onset glycogen storage disease type II (adult onset Pompe disease): report and magnetic resonance images of two cases. Skeletal Radiol. 2009 Dec.38(12):1205-1208. Pubmedid: 19771425.
-
Patient Comments
0 patients rated this provider
The Provider Rating is an average of all responses to specific care provider-related questions from our nationally-recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey. Responses are measured on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the best score.
Patients that are treated in outpatient or hospital environments may receive different surveys, and the volume of responses will vary by question.
Learn more about our patient satisfaction surveyComments
Comments are gathered from specific care provider-related questions from our Patient Satisfaction Survey . The comments are submitted by patients and reflect their views and opinions. Patients are de-identified for confidentiality and patient privacy.
Learn more about our patient comments
We post both positive and negative comments from the surveys. We do not post comments that are libelous, slanderous, profane, irrelevant or otherwise inappropriate or may risk the privacy of our patients. A “[…]” in the comments below indicates de-identified patient information or comments that are unrelated to the patient’s experience with the visit to the provider, such as comments related to another provider, about the survey itself, or otherwise completely off-topic.
Provider Ratings and comments are gathered from our nationally-recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey. If a provider does not have ratings or comments listed it can be for several reasons, including:
Learn more about our patient satisfaction survey, ratings and comments