Arthur Parsee, MD
Arthur Parsee, MD
Program: Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology
Dr. Parsee earned his MD at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine. He completed a Diagnostic Radiology Residency at Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, where he also served as Chief Resident. Dr. Parsee completed an Abdominal Imaging Fellowship at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina. He was an Assistant Professor at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, where he served as Section Chief of Abdominal Imaging and Medical Director of Ultrasound. Prior to joining Moffitt, Dr. Parsee also served in the section of Abdominal Imaging, and as the Regional Quality Improvement Officer at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.
Education & Training
- Radiology - Diagnostic Radiology
- Felder SI, Feuerlein S, Parsee A, Imanirad I, Sanchez J, Dessureault S, Kim R, Hoffe S, Frakes J, Costello J. Endoscopic and MRI response evaluation following neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: a pictorial review with matched MRI, endoscopic, and pathologic examples. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 May.46(5):1783-1804. Pubmedid: 33111189.
- Ahmed A, Morse BJ, Makanji RJ, Caracciolo JT, Parsee A. Retropubic parasymphyseal cyst: A rare entity. Radiol Case Rep. 2020 Sep.15(9):1669-1672. Pubmedid: 32714480. Pmcid: PMC7369357.
- Parsee AA, Thomas KL, Ghayouri M, Mehta R, Latifi K, Sweeney J, Jeong D, Ahmed A. Rare Abdominal Wall Metastasis following Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer: What Can Be Learned from the Use of Percutaneous Catheters?. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2020 May.2020:3738798. Pubmedid: 32509367. Pmcid: PMC7244962.
- Pejic M, Parsee AA. Afferent Loop Syndrome with Intestinal Ischemia due to Internal Hernia after Whipple Operation for T2N1M0 Pancreatic Cancer. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 Jul.10:43. Pubmedid: 32754378. Pmcid: PMC7395522.
- Parsee AA, McDonald JA, Jiang K, Latifi K, Mehta R, Frakes JM, Pimiento JM, Hoffe SE. Radiation-induced hepatitis masquerading as metastatic disease: the importance of correlating diagnostic imaging with treatment planning. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Feb.11(1):133-138. Pubmedid: 32175116. Pmcid: PMC7052759.
- Polk SL, Montilla-Soler J, Gage KL, Parsee A, Jeong D. Cardiac Metastases in Neuroendocrine Tumors: 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Correlation. Clin Nucl Med. 2020 Apr.45(4):e201-e205. Pubmedid: 32049725.
Patient CommentsOverall Satisfaction0
0 patients rated this provider
The Provider Rating is an average of all responses to specific care provider-related questions from our nationally-recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey. Responses are measured on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the best score.
Patients that are treated in outpatient or hospital environments may receive different surveys, and the volume of responses will vary by question.Learn more about our patient satisfaction survey
Comments are gathered from specific care provider-related questions from our Patient Satisfaction Survey . The comments are submitted by patients and reflect their views and opinions. Patients are de-identified for confidentiality and patient privacy.
We post both positive and negative comments from the surveys. We do not post comments that are libelous, slanderous, profane, irrelevant or otherwise inappropriate or may risk the privacy of our patients. A “[…]” in the comments below indicates de-identified patient information or comments that are unrelated to the patient’s experience with the visit to the provider, such as comments related to another provider, about the survey itself, or otherwise completely off-topic.
Not all providers will have a star rating or comments. In order to ensure accuracy of our ratings, we only display ratings for providers who have a minimum of 30 completed from the previous 12 months.
Provider Ratings and comments are gathered from our nationally-recognized Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey. If a provider does not have ratings or comments listed it can be for several reasons, including:
- The provider has not yet received the minimum number of patient satisfaction surveys to be eligible for display. We require a minimum of 30 surveys before we post results to ensure that the rating is statistically reliable and a true reflection of patient satisfaction.
- He or she may be a researcher or other type of provider that does not see patients.
- The provider practices in a specialty or office that does not use the specified surveys currently used for these ratings.